Penakut or Pengecut?

Dua perkataan yang berbeza namun ada persamaanya dalam pengertian tentang pilihan raya DUN penanti di Pulau Pinang.


Layakkah aku bercakap hal-hal negeri orang lain? Layakkah? I am not just comments other states for the sake of commenting! And, I might comment you as well, as you don't have the right to comment me if you think I don't have right to comment other states!


Penakut? perkataan penakut berasal daripada orang indonesia (Jawa) sewaktu system perniagaan barter 100 tahun lalu di perairan Johor dan Kalimanatan Jawa ketika itu. Mereka yang hendak berniaga tapi tak sampai ke hujung sungai dikatakan penakut oleh orang2 saudagar ketika itu. Tak percaya? lihat sejarah lah!


Pengecut? perkataan pengecut pula bermula daripada Sultan di setiap negeri seperti Melaka yang ketika itu bertarung kekuatan atau kehandalan menentang pemberontak ketika itu. Mereka yang enggan menurut perintah untuk menentang pahlawan dikata kan pengecut! Tak percaya juga? baca hikayat Hang Tua atau Hang Jebat lah..


Jadi, sesiapa sahaja pemimpin/parti mahupun BN/PR yang hendak or tidak menentang mana2 dalam pilihan raya yang di kata kan adil kerana process democray.. Taulah mana satu perkataan yang digunakan keatas mereka "pengecut atau penakut".


Lebih2 lagi pilihan raya penanti yang di kosongkan oleh wakil PKR yang juga bekas timbalan KM1 pulau pinang. Jangan takut kalau hendak memperbetulkan erti "pencapaian di dahulukan" kalau tak di sebalik pula ertinya "Pengecut di dahulukan" baru tau.


Think about it.

Malaysia is about to lost democracy!

Malaysia will lost its virgin democracy if the current rolling government denying people's rights. Referring to Perak and Sabah, it was a real harassment. Why can't returned the power to the voters to choose their preference MB?

BN vs PR or High Court vs Federal Court?

Feel so funny when the high court doesn't have same ideology of judging.

1. BN vs PR (Democracy)

2. Court vs Court (Judge)

The question, which one is right?

I took an example.. Kurup was declared "fault" in his Pensiangan Parliament seat where need to vacant and thereafter allow another election. Later he (Kurup) referred the decision to the federal high court seeking for another second opportunity. (Try his luck in the Federal High Court where always interfered by Prime Minister's office). Two months later Kurup was announced as still the rightful member of Pensiangan Parliament.. Funny right? The decision is too confusing to all people including my self.

Second, the Perak rightful MB should be Dato Nizar and not Dr. Zamry. Therefore, Zamry appeal and referred the decision to the federal court as aslo seeking for another opportunity like Kurup. In the same time, Zamry has filed another case to prevent Nizar to dicharge his official duty as a rightful MB until a decision comes from the federal high court. Agan, very funny where disclosed Power Crazy. 

What is this all about? Might as well BN should accept the high court decision in a very honourable way. You see, Dato Nizar was not really bother of his position but rather leaved it to people of perak to decide who will be their chosen to be the next MB. I find that the approached taken by Dato Nizar should be the best way and allow democracy to resolve the problem and not to play game in the court. Why take so difficult to decide?

Think about it!!

Prime Minister for Rakyat..

PM for rakyat means really serve rakyat with opportunities. One Malaysia concept is really impressed but due to the lake of delivery system, all will be abandon. 


Let people of Sabah/Sarawak lead their state to be the HOD for all federal government offices in SABAH/SARAWAK. 

Perak Again?

Huh! I was impressed when the High Court declared that Nijar is still the MB of Perak. But still can be challenged via Federal Court. When the BN appealed and referred the decision of high court to the federal court you will see what will happen. Federal court decision will definitively different.  Might as well leave it to the people of Perak to decide.