SILENT VS TALKATIVE

To me there are pros and cons for this. I may have the option to agree or disagree but in reality sometime this is work. 

If I choose to disagree then I must explain the reason. First, if you continue being a silent then there will be no conclusion on your problem, discussion and conversation. 

And, if you continue not to share your opinion to avoid hurting other people then it's your right. However, God give everything for us to use including brand to think and mouth to talk but just because you limited them in some point then everything's turn to abandon. Some people can talk and even can judge but weak of point therefore easily be challenged. 

To me, it's their personality. Talking based on experience without fact is something like sharing story. Everyone can talk and even can explain in detail via past experience but then it's a matter of how your explain or deliver it to others. Just imagine if you're a boss in your company or leader in an organisation. When you talking about your past experience or performance to the audience then you must do it in a very systematic manner; apply the point, relates to the subject and explain the outcome. Make your experience be their guidance and motivation. Accept every question with a valid answer and create conclusion. Let the audience improve their confident level when facing outside's challenger. 

Second, the worse things when someone did not understand what are you talking about. Lets say you are a doctor by profession. Your have the knowledge in medical and determination for the finding of their illness. It is your JOB to explain and not just tell the patient illness and how to cue it. If patients trust you then you will be their personal reference.